Sitemap
- About Advisory Opinions
- About Mediation and Arbitration
- About the Office of the Property Rights Ombudsman
- About the Ombudsman
- Advisory Opinion Topics
- Appealing Land Use Decisions
- Application Review Fees
- Compelling, Countervailing Interests
- Complete Land Use Application
- Compliance With Land Use Ordinances
- Conditional Use Applications
- Development Bonds
- Entitlement to Application Approval
- Exactions on Development
- Impact Fees Act
- Interpretation of Ordinances
- Limit on Single Family Designation
- Nonconforming Uses and Structures
- Occupation or Use of Property
- Pending Ordinances
- Proceeding With Reasonable Diligence
- Requirements Imposed On Development
- Review for Application Completeness
- Review of Warranty Work
- Review Within a Reasonable Time
- Subdivision Plat Approval
- Substantive Land Use Review
- Temporary Land Use Ordinances
- Transferable Development Rights
- Advisory Opinions
- Advisory Opinion 1
- Advisory Opinion 10
- Advisory Opinion 100
- Advisory Opinion 101
- Advisory Opinion 102
- Advisory Opinion 103
- Advisory Opinion 104
- Advisory Opinion 105
- Advisory Opinion 106
- Advisory Opinion 107
- Advisory Opinion 108
- Advisory Opinion 109
- Advisory Opinion 11
- Advisory Opinion 110
- Advisory Opinion 111
- Advisory Opinion 112
- Advisory Opinion 113
- Advisory Opinion 114
- Advisory Opinion 115
- Advisory Opinion 116
- Advisory Opinion 117
- Advisory Opinion 118
- Advisory Opinion 119
- Advisory Opinion 12
- Advisory Opinion 120
- Advisory Opinion 121
- Advisory Opinion 122
- Advisory Opinion 123
- Advisory Opinion 124
- Advisory Opinion 125
- Advisory Opinion 126
- Advisory Opinion 127
- Advisory Opinion 128
- Advisory Opinion 129
- Advisory Opinion 13
- Advisory Opinion 130
- Advisory Opinion 131
- Advisory Opinion 132
- Advisory Opinion 133
- Advisory Opinion 134
- Advisory Opinion 135
- Advisory Opinion 136
- Advisory Opinion 137
- Advisory Opinion 138
- Advisory Opinion 139
- Advisory Opinion 14
- Advisory Opinion 140
- Advisory Opinion 141
- Advisory Opinion 142
- Advisory Opinion 143
- Advisory Opinion 144
- Advisory Opinion 145
- Advisory Opinion 146
- Advisory Opinion 147
- Advisory Opinion 148
- Advisory Opinion 149
- Advisory Opinion 15
- Advisory Opinion 150
- Advisory Opinion 151
- Advisory Opinion 152
- Advisory Opinion 153
- Advisory Opinion 154
- Advisory Opinion 155
- Advisory Opinion 156
- Advisory Opinion 157
- Advisory Opinion 158
- Advisory Opinion 159
- Advisory Opinion 16
- Advisory Opinion 160
- Advisory Opinion 161
- Advisory Opinion 162
- Advisory Opinion 163
- Advisory Opinion 164
- Advisory Opinion 165
- Advisory Opinion 166
- Advisory Opinion 167
- Advisory Opinion 168
- Advisory Opinion 169
- Advisory Opinion 17
- Advisory Opinion 170
- Advisory Opinion 171
- Advisory Opinion 172
- Advisory Opinion 173
- Advisory Opinion 174
- Advisory Opinion 175
- Advisory Opinion 176
- Advisory Opinion 177
- Advisory Opinion 178
- Advisory Opinion 179
- Advisory Opinion 18
- Advisory Opinion 180
- Advisory Opinion 181
- Advisory Opinion 182
- Advisory Opinion 183
- Advisory Opinion 184
- Advisory Opinion 185
- Advisory Opinion 186
- Advisory Opinion 187
- Advisory Opinion 188
- Advisory Opinion 189
- Advisory Opinion 19
- Advisory Opinion 190
- Advisory Opinion 191
- Advisory Opinion 192
- Advisory Opinion 193
- Advisory Opinion 194
- Advisory Opinion 195
- Advisory Opinion 196
- Advisory Opinion 197
- Advisory Opinion 198
- Advisory Opinion 199
- Advisory Opinion 2
- Advisory Opinion 20
- Advisory Opinion 200
- Advisory Opinion 201
- Advisory Opinion 202
- Advisory Opinion 203
- Advisory Opinion 204
- Advisory Opinion 205
- Advisory Opinion 206
- Advisory Opinion 207
- Advisory Opinion 208
- Advisory Opinion 209
- Advisory Opinion 21
- Advisory Opinion 210
- Advisory Opinion 211
- Advisory Opinion 212
- Advisory Opinion 213
- Advisory Opinion 214
- Advisory Opinion 215
- Advisory Opinion 216
- Advisory Opinion 217
- Advisory Opinion 218
- Advisory Opinion 219
- Advisory Opinion 22
- Advisory Opinion 220
- Advisory Opinion 221
- Advisory Opinion 222
- Advisory Opinion 223
- Advisory Opinion 224
- Advisory Opinion 225
- Advisory Opinion 226
- Advisory Opinion 227
- Advisory Opinion 228
- Advisory Opinion 229
- Advisory Opinion 23
- Advisory Opinion 230
- Advisory Opinion 231
- Advisory Opinion 232
- Advisory Opinion 233
- Advisory Opinion 234
- Advisory Opinion 235
- Advisory Opinion 236
- Advisory Opinion 237
- Advisory Opinion 238
- Advisory Opinion 239
- Advisory Opinion 24
- Advisory Opinion 240
- Advisory Opinion 241
- Advisory Opinion 242
- Advisory Opinion 243
- Advisory Opinion 244
- Advisory Opinion 245
- Advisory Opinion 246
- Advisory Opinion 247
- Advisory Opinion 248
- Advisory Opinion 249
- Advisory Opinion 25
- Advisory Opinion 250
- Advisory Opinion 251
- Advisory Opinion 252
- Advisory Opinion 253
- Advisory Opinion 254
- Advisory Opinion 255
- Advisory Opinion 256
- Advisory Opinion 257
- Advisory Opinion 258
- Advisory Opinion 259
- Advisory Opinion 26
- Advisory Opinion 260
- Advisory Opinion 261
- Advisory Opinion 262
- Advisory Opinion 263
- Advisory Opinion 264
- Advisory Opinion 265
- Advisory Opinion 266
- Advisory Opinion 267
- Advisory Opinion 268
- Advisory Opinion 269
- Advisory Opinion 27
- Advisory Opinion 270
- Advisory Opinion 271
- Advisory Opinion 273
- Advisory Opinion 274
- Advisory Opinion 275
- Advisory Opinion 276
- Advisory Opinion 277
- Advisory Opinion 278
- Advisory Opinion 279
- Advisory Opinion 28
- Advisory Opinion 280
- Advisory Opinion 281
- Advisory Opinion 282
- Advisory Opinion 283
- Advisory Opinion 284
- Advisory Opinion 285
- Advisory Opinion 286
- Advisory Opinion 287
- Advisory Opinion 288
- Advisory Opinion 289
- Advisory Opinion 29
- Advisory Opinion 290
- Advisory Opinion 291
- Advisory Opinion 292
- Advisory Opinion 3
- Advisory Opinion 30
- Advisory Opinion 31
- Advisory Opinion 32
- Advisory Opinion 33
- Advisory Opinion 34
- Advisory Opinion 35
- Advisory Opinion 36
- Advisory Opinion 37
- Advisory Opinion 38
- Advisory Opinion 39
- Advisory Opinion 4
- Advisory Opinion 40
- Advisory Opinion 41
- Advisory Opinion 42
- Advisory Opinion 43
- Advisory Opinion 44
- Advisory Opinion 45
- Advisory Opinion 46
- Advisory Opinion 47
- Advisory Opinion 48
- Advisory Opinion 49
- Advisory Opinion 5
- Advisory Opinion 50
- Advisory Opinion 51
- Advisory Opinion 52
- Advisory Opinion 53
- Advisory Opinion 54
- Advisory Opinion 55
- Advisory Opinion 56
- Advisory Opinion 57
- Advisory Opinion 58
- Advisory Opinion 59
- Advisory Opinion 6
- Advisory Opinion 60
- Advisory Opinion 61
- Advisory Opinion 62
- Advisory Opinion 63
- Advisory Opinion 64
- Advisory Opinion 65
- Advisory Opinion 66
- Advisory Opinion 67
- Advisory Opinion 68
- Advisory Opinion 69
- Advisory Opinion 7
- Advisory Opinion 70
- Advisory Opinion 71
- Advisory Opinion 72
- Advisory Opinion 73
- Advisory Opinion 74
- Advisory Opinion 75
- Advisory Opinion 76
- Advisory Opinion 77
- Advisory Opinion 78
- Advisory Opinion 79
- Advisory Opinion 8
- Advisory Opinion 80
- Advisory Opinion 81
- Advisory Opinion 82
- Advisory Opinion 83
- Advisory Opinion 84
- Advisory Opinion 85
- Advisory Opinion 86
- Advisory Opinion 87
- Advisory Opinion 88
- Advisory Opinion 89
- Advisory Opinion 9
- Advisory Opinion 90
- Advisory Opinion 91
- Advisory Opinion 92
- Advisory Opinion 93
- Advisory Opinion 94
- Advisory Opinion 95
- Advisory Opinion 96
- Advisory Opinion 97
- Advisory Opinion 98
- Advisory Opinion 99
- Case Summaries
- Contact Us
- Disclosures and Information for Property Owners
- Find the Law
- Appellate Decisions
- Alta v. Ben Hame Corp.
- B.A.M. Development, LLC v. Salt Lake County (“BAM I”)
- B.A.M. Development, LLC v. Salt Lake County (“BAM II”)
- B.A.M. Development, LLC v. Salt Lake County (“BAM III”)
- Bagford v. Ephraim City
- Bahr v. Imus
- Banberry Development Corp. v. City of South Jordan
- Berman v. Parker
- Bingham v. Roosevelt City
- Bountiful City v. DeLuca
- Bradley v. Payson City
- Call v. City of West Jordan
- Carrier v. Lindquist
- Cases Listed Alphabetically
- Cedar Mountain Environmental, Inc. v. Tooele County
- City of Grantsville v. Tooele City
- City of Hildale v. Cooke
- City of Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey
- Colman v. Utah State Land Board
- Conatser v. Johnson
- Cornish Town v. Koller
- Dairy Product Services, Inc. v. City of Wellsville
- Davis County v. Clearfield City
- Davis County v. Zions First National Bank
- Diamond B-Y Ranches v. Tooele County
- Dolan v. City of Tigard
- Eminent Domain Cases
- Exactions and Impact Fees Cases
- Farmer’s New World Life Insurance Co. v. Bountiful City
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v. County of Los Angeles
- Fox v. Park City
- Gillmor v. Summit County
- Hamblin v. Clearfield City
- Harmon City, Inc. v. Draper City
- Hatch v. Boulder Town
- Hawai’i Housing Authority v. Midkiff
- Hogs R Us v. Town of Fairfield
- Home Builders Association v. American Fork
- Home Builders Association v. City of North Logan
- Just Compensation Cases
- Kelo v. City of New London
- Keystone Bituminous Coal Ass’n v. DeBenedictis
- Koontz v. St Johns River Water Management District
- Krejci v. Saratoga Springs
- Land Use Appeals Cases
- Land Use Regulation Cases
- LC Canyon Partners, LLC v. Salt Lake County
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council
- Marion Energy, Inc. v. KFJ Ranch Partnership
- Morrison v. Horne
- Nollan v. California Coastal Commission
- Olsen v. Park City
- Pacific West Communities, Inc. v. City of Grantsville
- Palazzolo v. Rhode Island
- Patterson v. American Fork
- Pen & Ink, LLC v. Alpine City
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon
- Petersen v. Riverton City
- Price Development Co. v. Orem City
- Provo City v. Ivie
- Q-2, LLC v. Hughes
- Rocky Mountain Thrift Stores, Inc. v. Salt Lake City
- Salt Lake City Mission v. Salt Lake City
- Salt Lake County v. Granite Board of Education
- Salt Lake County v. Kartchner
- Sanguinetti v. United States
- Save Our Canyons v. Board of Adjustment of Salt Lake County
- Scherbel v. Salt Lake City
- Schroeder Investments, LC v. UDOT
- Selman v. Box Elder County
- Smith Investment Company v. Sandy City
- Stucker v. Summit County
- Takings Cases
- The Carpet Barn v. UDOT
- Three D Corp. v. Salt Lake City
- Tooele Associates, LP v. Tooele City
- Tooele County v. Ferrebee
- UDOT v. Admiral Beverage Corp.
- UDOT v. FPA West Point, LLC
- UDOT v. Harvey Real Estate
- Uintah Mountain RTC, LLC v. Duchesne County
- Utah County v. Baxter
- Utah County v. Young
- Van Denburgh v. Sweeney Land Co.
- Vested Rights Cases
- Vial v. Provo City
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty
- Wadsworth v. West Jordan City
- Wasatch County v. Okelberry
- Wells v. Salt Lake City Board of Adjustment
- Western Land Equities v. City of Logan
- Wintergreen Group, LLC v. UDOT
- Xanthos v. Salt Lake City Board of Adjustment
- Yee v. City of Escondido
- Codes and Constitutions
- Glossary
- Legal Topics
- Access Rights
- Adverse Possession
- Boundary Disputes
- Conditional Uses
- Easements
- Exactions
- Impact Fees
- Just Compensation
- Land Use Appeals and Appeal Authorities
- Nonconforming Uses and Noncomplying Structures
- Open and Public Meetings
- Temporary Land Use Regulation (Moratorium)
- Transferable Development Rights
- Utah’s Constitutional Takings Issues Act
- Utah’s Land Use, Development, and Management Act (LUDMA)
- Utah’s Prescriptive Road Statute
- Utah’s Private Property Protection Act
- Utah’s Takings Clause
- Variances
- Vested Rights
- Voter Initiatives and Referenda
- Zoning Estoppel
- Appellate Decisions
- Home
- Land Use Academy of Utah
- Land Use and Development
- Land Use Training Funds
- Notice to Property Owners
- Search Results
- Takings and Eminent Domain
- Training